LNG Export Study Released

The Long awaited LNG export study commissioned by U.S. Department of Energy was released yesterday (http://www.fossil.energy.gov/programs/gasregulation/reports/nera_lng_report.pdf). The results  were not surprising, LNG exports will benefit  the overall U.S. economy: “Across all these scenarios, the U.S. was projected to gain net economic benefits from allowing LNG exports. Moreover, for every one of the market scenarios examined, net economic benefits increased as the level of LNG exports increased. In particular, scenarios with unlimited exports always had higher net economic benefits than corresponding cases with limited exports. In all of these cases, benefits that come from export expansion more than outweigh the losses from reduced capital and wage income to U.S. consumers, and hence LNG exports have net economic benefits in spite of higher domestic natural gas prices. This is exactly the outcome that economic theory describes when barriers to trade are removed.” (page 1) LNG or other energy product exports should not be seen any different than exporting cars or corn. Wall Street Journal’s December 7 editorial (http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324001104578163491822943984.html?user=welcome) was right on point: “Not that the report will mute the critics, who include Massachusetts Congressman Ed Markey and Oregon Senator Ron Wyden. Mr. Markey worries that exports will allow a “massive wealth transfer…

Continue reading

Cash Flow Matters

Investment in energy production driving economic growth in Midwest and Great Plains states. So why would lawmakers consider dimming this one this one bright spot in the economy by targeting and eliminating many of the tax code provisions that have facilitated investment and jobs? Accelerated depreciation, deductions for interest expense, LIFO for inventory accounting should not be a trade off for corporate income tax rate cuts. America’s energy seen adding 3.6 million jobs, 3 percent GDP Daily Herald – August 19, 2012 On the eastern bank of the Mississippi River, about an hour upstream from New Orleans, the outline of Nucor Corp.’s new $750 million iron-processing plant is rising between fields of sugar cane and sweet gum trees. Surveying the facility from the road, Michael Eades, president of Ascension Economic Development Corp., says it’s part of a wave of investment lured by low natural gas prices to this stretch of Louisiana’s industrial riverfront. Companies such as Westlake Chemical Corp., Potash Corp. of Saskatchewan Inc. and Methanex Corp. have projects in the works. Ormet Corp. reopened an alumina refinery last year, bringing back 250 jobs. “We’re just seeing an incredible amount of activity,” said Eades, who tallied $1.1 billion in new…

Continue reading

Pro-Growth Tax Code, Regulatory Certainty Best Tools for Businesses to Implement Climate Change Adaptations

At a hearing today of the Senate Environment & Public Works Committee, I testified that businesses seeking to adapt to changing climate and weather models are best served by a tax code that retains robust capital cost recovery, coupled with reductions in regulatory and permitting barriers.  Business investments are judged on the basis of their costs and benefits and until there is more convergence on the wide range of climate modeling, businesses are unlikely to make any adaptations beyond “no regrets” steps (or changes that would be undertaken in the normal course of business). Read more about the hearing and see my full testimony here.

Continue reading

Cash Flow Matters

In testimony submitted to House Ways & Means Committee this week, I made the case that tax provisions like accelerated depreciation are helping spur investment, income and job growth, particularly in the Midwest and Great Plains states. They should not be sacrificed in the coming tax reform battle. Read the Executive Summary and Full Testimony here.

Continue reading

Forbes: The Horrific Accident Awaiting Us Over the Fiscal Cliff

See the op-ed I co-authored with Dr. Allen Sinai in Forbes today.  We highlight the dangers that lie ahead if lawmakers allow the Bush-era tax cuts to expire. The Horrific Accident Awaiting Us Over The Fiscal Cliff With the U.S. elections rapidly approaching, only to be quickly followed by the “Bush tax cuts” expiring at the end of the year in the absence of action by the President and a soon-to-be lame duck Congress, the reality is that failure to confront this deadline will result in a wave of tax spikes that will cause heavy job losses, reduce economic activity significantly, and produce a hit to financial markets that could set the economy off into another recessionary tailspin.  Our focus is on the tax piece of the “Fiscal Cliff.” Stark political lines have been drawn.  Republicans have called for a quick, temporary across-the-board extension for all tax cuts until real tax reform can be undertaken.  President Obama and Democratic leaders are amenable to temporary extensions but are standing firm against extending any tax cuts for the wealthy. The stakes are extremely high in this game of political poker, so it is important to know the ramifications of the bets, particularly when it…

Continue reading