Senate Committee Sinks Navy’s Renewable Energy Plans

The Navy’s renewable energy plan seems to be fading into the distance.  Yesterday, the Senate Armed Services Committee voted to strip much of its buying power of alternative fuels.  The Senate appears to be nearly in lock-step with the House who are also skeptical of the “Great Green Fleet.” As I noted on National Journal’s Energy & Environment Experts Blog this week, the high cost of renewable energy sources like wind, solar and biofuels will be extremely costly to taxpayers and inefficient for our troops–ultimately weakening our military forces.  You can read my full response here:

Continue reading

Depreciation Schedule Important to Investment and Growth

Today’s Bloomberg BNA Daily Tax Report story covers the uncertainty about depreciation allowances and how it is impeding new investment and job growth in the restaurant and retail sector. Legislation (H.R. 1265, S. 687) pending in both chambers would make permanent the 15-year depreciation schedule, which lawmakers and lobbyists said would provide businesses with the certainty they need to make long-term plans. The legislation is not scored, though a two year-plan covering tax years 2010 and 2011 that was enacted in December 2010 cost $3.6 billion over 10 years. “There are projects to renovate retail spaces that are being delayed because of the uncertainty in the tax law right now,” Bernstein said. “And those delays in remodeling projects cost jobs.” Delays cost construction jobs, construction materials, the potential for increased foot traffic and sales, and more employment in the store or restaurant, she said. Koenig said once the extenders phase is passed and substantive work on tax reform resumes, it is possible that lobbyists will ask lawmakers to look at an even shorter depreciation schedule. “We would argue that 15 [years] may even be too high,” he told BNA, noting that in the restaurant industry, the franchisee/franchisor agreement often states…

Continue reading

Renewable Energy Sources Not Delivering ROI to Taxpayers

I met with House Subcommittee Chairman Paul Brown (R-GA) ahead of my testimony House Subcommittees on Energy and Environment and Investigations and Oversight and the Committee on Science, Space and Technology this morning. I will discuss how costly renewable energy sources (solar, wind, biofuels) receive lion’s share of federal subsidies but are inefficient and yield minimal return to taxpayers. Cutbacks should be considered to help shore up our spiraling U.S. debt. Watch live here:http://mfile.akamai.com/65778/live/reflector:39667.asx?bkup=39949&prop=n

Continue reading

Consequences of Trading Depreciation for Corporate Tax Cuts

This week President Obama released his plan for corporate tax reform which could place accelerated depreciation on the chopping block.  I submitted testimony to the House Ways & Means Committee on their recent hearing on “Interaction of Tax and Financial Accounting on Tax Reform.” A couple of key points: If accelerated depreciation for equipment is repealed and replaced with economic depreciation which is generally longer than the current Modified Accelerated Cost Recovery System (MACRS), the cost of capital for new equipment will rise and investment is likely be as much as $191 billion lower in 2015 compared  to the baseline.  Each  $1 billion decline in investment is associated with a loss of 23,300 jobs. Since the 4th quarter of 2007, which marks the beginning of the recession, through the 4th quarter of 2011, U.S. equipment investment has increased by 3.4%. Given the weakness of consumer demand during this period (real personal consumption expenditures increased only 1.8% during the past 4 years) it seems likely that accelerated and bonus deprecation have played a major role in sustaining investment in equipment. You can read the full testimony here.

Continue reading

Tax Reform and U.S. Investment and Job Growth

Fed-Ex Chairman Fred Smith said tax reform was a key element for restoring strong U.S. economic growth.  The Bowles-Simpson plan is his preferred approach, but he would like to see continuation of the now expired expensing provisions for capital investment in the stimulus bill.  See today’s CNBC segment here: His company and many others took advantage of the very powerful reduction in the cost of capital for investment from 2008-2010 via the Economic Stimulus Act of 2008 and subsequent legislation. Scholarly work over the last two decades including some by ACCF Scholars John Shoven and Dale Jorgenson have shown that favorable investment provisions and the investment tax credit have a powerful impact on generating new investment.  ACCF research shows that each one billion dollar increase in investment is associated with 15-22,000 new jobs and conversely decreases investment, cut employment by the same amount: Other ACCF research conducted by Dr. Allen Sinai shows that had the U.S. had a consumed income tax (where all investment is expensed) real US GDP would have been 5% higher in the 2001-2004 period.  

Continue reading

My Thoughts on State of the Union Address

This week I offered my reaction to President Obama’s remarks on energy policy in his State of the Union address:   Renewables: Time to Move On By Margo Thorning Chief Economist, American Council for Capital Formation President Obama announced expansion of domestic oil and gas drilling which is a positive step. But then he renewed his commitment to backing renewable energy sources. There’s a time for stubbornness and a time to move on. The Department of Energy’s EIA shows that new electric generating capacity using wind and solar power tends to be considerably more expensive than conventional, available and secure natural gas and coal resources. And in a world of real tradeoffs, every dollar spent on expensive renewable energy is money that could have been used by households and business for purchasing consumer goods or productive new investments that make economic sense. Increasing aggregate demand is key to strong U.S. job growth; spending more than is necessary on energy is a drag on overall demand for goods and services. Indeed, there is a direct linkage between energy use and economic recovery, as in recent years each 1 percent increase in Gross Domestic Product in the U.S. has been accompanied by a…

Continue reading