SEC Must Reconsider Scope 3 Reporting in the Proposed Climate Risk Disclosure Rule

On June 17, the Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) is due to receive comments from companies and interested parties in response to the SEC proposed Climate Risk Disclosure Rule. The proposed rule is well-intentioned, but to say the least, very controversial. As comments are received, the SEC will be charged with absorbing a wide range of perspectives, including concerns, but also suggestions for improvement. By way of background, on March 21, 2022, the SEC proposed a rule that would require registrants to report climate-related disclosures in their filings, including information about climate-related risks that might have a material impact on their business operations and financial results as a part of audited financial statements. The information about climate-related risks also would include disclosure of greenhouse gas emissions, referred to as “Scope” emissions. Those include direct greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (Scope 1), and indirect emissions from purchased forms of energy (Scope 2). Most controversial, however, is a requirement to disclose GHG emissions from upstream and downstream activities within its business operations value chain (Scope 3). By definition, Scope 3 emissions include those resulting from activities or assets not directly controlled or owned by the registrant, but they are part of the upstream (suppliers)…

Continue reading

Access to Stock Market Data – Transparent, Detailed, and Timely Data is King

The SEC has recently focused its attention on transparency regarding all aspects of the capital markets. This is seen by many as an attempt to ensure that Main Street investors have detailed and timely information necessary to make informed investment decisions. One area that has come under review is how, when, and at what cost do investors have access to market data. Under the SEC’s Regulation National Market System, exchanges such as the NYSE and Nasdaq must make their “best bids and offers” data available to Securities Information Processors (SIPs).[1] This data is seen as crucial to inform investors on the status of the market. The SIPs are coincidentally also managed by the exchanges to ensure that this vital data is made public in a non-discriminatory manner and at a reasonable cost. However, in addition to this quasi-public data, the exchanges offer more detailed data on limit orders at prices below “best bids and offers,” which is extremely valuable in getting a full assessment of the securities market. This more detailed, valuable, and arguably necessary data is considered proprietary and as such is offered at a premium. However, even though this more detailed data is considered proprietary, the fees assessed…

Continue reading